Journal of Business, Social and Technology (Bustechno) http://bustechno.ridwaninstitute.co.id/index.php/jbt/issue/current |
THE EFFECT OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION ON LOYALTY �OF THE LEMBANG FLOATING MARKET TOURISM AREA
Maris Agung Triandewo, Klemens Wedanaji Prasastyo,
Alfira Azzahra
Trisakti School of Management, Jakarta, Indonesia
Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
|
Abstract |
Article Information: Received: 22-12-2022 Revised: 05-01-2023 Accepted: 19-01-2023 Keywords: Entertainment
Experience; Esthetic Experience; Escapism Experience; Customer Satisfaction;
Customer Loyalty. |
The main purpose of this study is to
find out the influence of Customer Experiences on Customer Loyalty through
Customer Satisfaction in visitors to the Floating Market Lembang tourist area, Bandung, West
Java,� assisted by the use of
Experience Economy. Experience Economy has four variables, that is,
Entertainment, Education, Aesthetic, and Escapist all of which are important
to map customers� tendency to prefer. Research utilizes a type of quantitative research that is
descriptive.� The data was supported
through distribution of
questionnaires to respondents with a total of 201.� This study utilized statistical methods via
SmartPLS 3.0. The results of this study show that except for Education, other
variables have positive and significant effect on Customer Satisfaction, that
is, Entertainment, Aesthetic, and Escapist. Education does not have impact on
Customer Satisfaction
because it is likely that customers come to Floating Market Lembang to enjoy and
relax, not learn, Thus, they do not need much education aspect of this
tourism area. Ultimately, Customer Satisfaction gives impact on Customer Loyalty. |
Introduction
The
tourism recreation sector, in recent decades, is seen as one of the largest
contributors to the country's income. According to data on the World Travel and
Tourism Council website, this sector has contributed about 10.4 percent
throughout 2019 to GDP (Gross Domestic Product) globally and is a larger number
than the utility sector (related to spending on electricity, water and fuel)
and the agricultural sector. In Indonesia, the tourism sector contributes
around 200 trillion rupiah to GDP and represents an increase of 15.4 percent
from the previous year (Indonesia, 2020). (White, 2007), Indonesia's
tourism sector only contributed about 4.671 billion US dollars (approximately
67 trillion rupiah), and this figure is also a decrease from 2019, which was
9.170 billion US dollars (131 trillion rupiah). Most of this decline is the
impact of the Covid-19 virus pandemic.
Indonesia is ranked 40th
globally in the Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI) issued by the
World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2019. This is a new achievement, where previously
Indonesia was ranked 42nd in 2017. While in the ASEAN region,
Indonesia is ranked fourth under Singapore (ranked 17th), Malaysia (ranked
29th), and Thailand (ranked 31st) (Rosenberg & Czepiel, 1984).
Table 1
Comparison of TTCI among Selected ASEAN from 2017 to 2019
Country |
Rank |
||
2017 (out of 136) |
2019 (out of 140) |
||
1 |
Singapura |
13 |
17 |
2 |
Malaysia |
26 |
29 |
3 |
Thailand |
34 |
31 |
4 |
Indonesia |
42 |
40 |
5 |
Vietnam |
67 |
63 |
Source: LAKIP Ministry of
Tourism and Economy
Recreational tourism does have its own charm, whether for
those who really like entertainment, or just taking a break from daily
activities and routines. Each country has its own uniqueness and
characteristics related to recreational tourism or attraction. This is influenced
by many factors, ranging from culture to regulations and the political
environment of the country. Some attractions are also equipped with facilities,
layout, and decorations that support an artificial atmosphere so that it is
expected to create a sensation for visitors who come. In Indonesia, the level
of tourist visits in general increases from year to year. This shows that
Indonesia has sufficient tourism potential to be utilized and developed.
There is one city in Indonesia that also has the potential
for creative and attractive tourism, namely Bandung. Located in the province of
West Java, Bandung is one of the largest metropolitan cities with a humid and
cool climate, so it is not surprising that it is a favorite place for local
residents to travel. A big city with natural conditions that give the
impression of calm, crowds with friendliness, and other similar expressions
have long described Bandung. Based on data obtained from the West Java Open
Data regarding the number of tourist visits in West Java Province, there has
been a significant increase, both foreign and local, visiting Bandung. The
highest overall number was achieved by West Bandung Regency, followed by
Bandung Regency, and then Bandung City. Figures from the graph show that West Bandung
Regency has an opportunity for their place or tourist attraction which can be
maximized by holding memorable events or celebrations in iconic places, where
one of the most popular is the Lembang Floating Market tourist area. Several
articles reported that there was an increase in the number of visitors to the
Lembang Floating Market tourist area by up to 50 percent in each high season or
peak season.
One of the areas claimed to be the largest contributor to
tourists in the West Bandung Regency area as stated in the Jabar Express (2022)
is Lembang. In the first quarter of 2020, Lembang contributed around 1.1
million tourists, both domestic and foreign. Although this number has decreased
by around 50 percent from the previous year, also due to capacity restrictions
related to the COVID-19 pandemic, Lembang seems to remain a popular tourist
destination in Bandung.
One of the most popular among all destinations is the Lembang
Floating Market or the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area which has been open
to the public since 2012. The Floating Market is a tourist area that initially
highlighted the shopping experience in floating markets such as in Thailand or
the Barito River, South Kalimantan. Now the Lembang Floating Market Tourism
Area has at least seven rides/attraction in it that present different concepts
and nuances in each place, such as: European-style Mini Town, Japanese Village,
Rainbow Garden, Water Games and Swimming Pool, Rabbit Park, Miniature Train,
and Outbound rides.
However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by all
restrictions and the implementation of health protocols, the average number of
visitors to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area is considered very
volatile. In 2020, they can only fulfill an average of 15 percent of the total
capacity. Then in 2021, the average number of visitors only met 10 percent of
the maximum capacity recommended by the government. Finally, in the first
quarter of 2022, an average of 20 percent of the maximum capacity has been
fulfilled. However, this figure is still far from their target of meeting 50
percent of the total capacity that can be accommodated by the Lembang Floating
Market Tourism Area.
Method
According to (Sugiyono & Kuantitatif, 2009), the
variables that influence or are the cause of the change or the emergence of the
dependent variable (bound) are the independent variables. The dependent
variable is the variable that is influenced or that becomes the result, because
of the independent variable.
The objects of this research
are Floating Market tourist area which is located in the Lembang area, West
Bandung Regency, West Java Province and has been opened since 2012. The
Floating Market tourist area in Lembang was chosen because the tourist spot has
four elements from the Experience Economy dimension. The selection of tourist
attractions with these criteria is needed to measure the influence between
variables more precisely.
Data was collected by
distributing questionnaires to respondents to meet the total number of samples
in the form of 201 people with the criteria set by the
researcher through a questionnaire in the form of Google Form as primary data
collection for research purposes.
The research hypothesis was
tested using a Structural Equation Model (SEM) approach based on Partial Least
Square (PLS). PLS is a component or variance based structural equation model.
SEM is one of the fields of statistical study that can test a series of
relationships that are relatively difficult to measure simultaneously.
Results and Discussion
Table 2
Responden�s
Age
Age |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
||
17 � 20 21 � 25 26 � 30 31 � 35 36 � 40 >40 Total |
18 61 48 30 26 18 201 |
9.0 30.3 23.9 14.9 12.9 9.0 100.0 |
9.0 30.3 23.9 14.9 12.9 9.0 100.0 |
9.0 39.3 63.2 78.1 91.0 100.0 |
||
Source: Data processing
IBM SPSS 25
In Table 2 it can be
seen that the total number of respondents collected were 201 people and grouped
by age, the researchers divided them into 6 parts, namely 17-20 years old,
21-25 years old, 26-30 years old, 31-35 years old, 36-40 years old. years, and
>40 years. The largest number were respondents aged 21-25 years with a total
of 61 people or 30.3 percent, followed by respondents aged 26-30 years with a
total of 48 people or 23.9 percent. The rest are respondents aged 31-35 years
with a total of 30 people or 14.9 percent, respondents aged 36-40 years with a
total of 26 people or 12.9 percent, and the rest are respondents aged 17-20
years and over 40 years with the same total, namely 18 people, or 9 percent.
The overall score for a total of 201 respondents was 100 percent.
Table
3���
Responden�s
Domicile
Domicile |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Jabodetabek Bandung Luar Jabodetabek dan Bandung Total |
141 17 43 201 |
70.1 8.5 21.4 100.0 |
70.1 8.5 21.4 100.0 |
70.1 78.6 100.0 |
In Table 3 it can be seen
that the total number of respondents collected was 201 people and grouped based
on their domicile which is divided into 3 parts, namely Jabodetabek, Bandung,
and outside Jabodetabek and Bandung. The largest number are respondents who
live in Greater Jakarta with a total of 141 people or 70.1 percent, followed by
respondents who live outside Greater Jakarta and Bandung with a total of 43
people or 21.4 percent. The rest are respondents who live in Bandung with a
total of 17 people or 8.5 percent. The overall score for a total of 201
respondents was 100 percent.
Table 4
Responden�s
Last Visit
Year |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
This Year (2022) 1 Year Ago (2021) 2 Years Ago (2020) Total |
80 81 40 201 |
39.8 40.3 19.9 100.0 |
39.8 40.3 19.9 100.0 |
39.8 80.1 100.0 |
In Table 4 it can be
seen that the total number of respondents collected was 201 people and grouped
based on their visit time (year) which is divided into 3 parts, namely this
year (2022), 1 year ago (2021), and 2 years ago (2020). The highest number was
the last visit 1 year ago (2021) with a total of 81 people or 40.3 percent,
then followed by the last visit this year (2022) with a total of 80 people or
39.8 percent. The rest was the last visit 2 years ago (2020) with a total of 40
people or 19.9 percent. The overall score for a total of 201 respondents was
100 percent.
A. Outer Model Evaluation
Validity
Test Table 5
�Average Variant Extracted
(AVE)
Variable |
AVE |
Critical Value |
Note |
Entertainment
Experience (X1) |
0.745 |
0.50 |
Valid |
Esthetic
Experience (X2) |
0.796 |
0.50 |
Valid |
Education
Experience (X3) |
0.833 |
0.50 |
Valid |
Escapism
Experience (X4) |
0.854 |
0.50 |
Valid |
Customer
Satisfaction (I) |
0.873 |
0.50 |
Valid |
Customer
Loyalty (Y) |
0.858 |
0.50 |
Valid |
Source: Data
Processing of Smart PLS 3
Based on the results of the AVE data test presented
in Table
5 above, it can be
seen that the AVE value of each variable has a value > 0.50. Thus it can be
stated that each research variable has met the requirements of good convergent
validity according to its AVE value.
Table 6
Cross Loading Score
|
Entertainment
Experience |
Esthetic Experience |
Education
Experience |
Escapism Experience |
Customer
Satisfaction |
Customer Loyalty |
ENT1 |
0.899 |
0.71 |
0.591 |
0.54 |
0.745 |
0.647 |
ENT2 |
0.857 |
0.749 |
0.638 |
0.594 |
0.751 |
0.726 |
ENT3 |
0.858 |
0.721 |
0.606 |
0.578 |
0.762 |
0.748 |
ENT4 |
0.837 |
0.646 |
0.58 |
0.489 |
0.661 |
0.6 |
EST1 |
0.706 |
0.897 |
0.626 |
0.649 |
0.73 |
0.701 |
EST2 |
0.701 |
0.927 |
0.613 |
0.6 |
0.718 |
0.704 |
EST3 |
0.757 |
0.857 |
0.563 |
0.548 |
0.738 |
0.662 |
EST4 |
0.76 |
0.885 |
0.683 |
0.674 |
0.736 |
0.701 |
EDU1 |
0.655 |
0.673 |
0.947 |
0.704 |
0.706 |
0.683 |
EDU2 |
0.654 |
0.65 |
0.94 |
0.647 |
0.688 |
0.657 |
EDU3 |
0.615 |
0.648 |
0.906 |
0.723 |
0.682 |
0.703 |
EDU4 |
0.629 |
0.571 |
0.856 |
0.594 |
0.677 |
0.627 |
ESC1 |
0.632 |
0.689 |
0.656 |
0.92 |
0.753 |
0.7 |
ESC2 |
0.542 |
0.574 |
0.689 |
0.927 |
0.659 |
0.693 |
ESC3 |
0.592 |
0.65 |
0.685 |
0.925 |
0.729 |
0.732 |
SAT1 |
0.8 |
0.761 |
0.705 |
0.71 |
0.944 |
0.768 |
SAT2 |
0.831 |
0.782 |
0.67 |
0.689 |
0.941 |
0.764 |
SAT3 |
0.744 |
0.754 |
0.74 |
0.772 |
0.918 |
0.805 |
LOY1 |
0.738 |
0.704 |
0.64 |
0.634 |
0.735 |
0.92 |
LOY2 |
0.701 |
0.728 |
0.736 |
0.782 |
0.783 |
0.911 |
LOY3 |
0.757 |
0.724 |
0.654 |
0.711 |
0.795 |
0.947 |
Source: Data Processing
of Smart PLS 3
Based on the data presented in Table 6 above, it can be seen that each research variable
indicator has a cross loading value greater than the cross loading value on
other variable indicators. Based on the results obtained, it can be stated that
the variable indicators used in this study have good discriminant validity
values, so it can be stated that the data has met the discriminant validity
requirements.
Reliability
Test Table 7
Composite Reliability Coefficient
Variable |
Composite
Reliability Coefficient |
Cronbach�s Alpha
Coefficient |
Critical Value |
Note |
Entertainment
Experience (X1) |
0.921 |
0.886 |
0.70 |
Reliable |
Esthetic
Experience (X2) |
0.940 |
0.914 |
0.70 |
Reliable |
Education
Experience (X3) |
0.952 |
0.933 |
0.70 |
Reliable |
Escapism
Experience (X4) |
0.946 |
0.915 |
0.70 |
Reliable |
Customer
Satisfaction (I) |
0.954 |
0.927 |
0.70 |
Reliable |
Customer
Loyalty (Y) |
0.948 |
0.917 |
0.70 |
Reliable |
Source: Data Processing
of Smart PLS 3
Based on the results of the Composite Reliability
test shown in Table 7 above, which is the part used to assess the reliability value of a data,
it can be seen that both Composite Reliability and Cronbach�s
Alpha values of all research variables are > 0.70. These results indicate that each
variable has met the requirements of the Composite Reliability critical value
so that it can be concluded that all variables have a good level of reliability
and reliability.
B.
Inner Model Evaluation
Source: Data
Processing of Smart PLS 1
Figure 1
Inner Model Scheme
The result of the R-Square value for Customer
Loyalty is 0.669 and the Adjusted R-Square value is 0.693, which means that
69.3 percent of the dependent variable Customer Loyalty (Y) has effectiveness
which is influenced by the intervening variable, namely Customer Satisfaction
(I). Meanwhile, the remaining 30.7 percent are influenced by other factors that
are outside the research framework.
Then, the result of the R-Square value for Customer
Satisfaction is 0.826 and the Adjusted R-Square value is 0.823, which means
that 82.6 percent of the Intervening Customer Satisfaction (I) variable has
effectiveness which is influenced by the independent variable, namely Entertainment
Experience (X1), Esthetic Experience (X2), Education Experience (X3), and Escapism
Experience (X4). Meanwhile, the remaining 17.4 percent are influenced by other
factors that are outside the research framework.
From the explanation of the
results of the data above, it can be concluded that the research model has good
feasibility.
Apart from the R-Square value, the assessment is also
known from the Q-Square value. The Q-Square value has the same meaning as the
coefficient determination (R-Square) in regression analysis, when the higher
the Q-Square, the model can be said to be better or more fit with the data. The
results of the calculation of the Q-Square value generated from the SmartPLS 3
calculation are 0.591 for the Customer Loyalty variable, and 0.712 for the
Customer Satisfaction variable.
Table 8
Hypothesis Test
Hypothesis |
Relationship |
Original Sample (O) |
T-Statistic |
P-values |
Note |
H1 |
Entertainment
Experience -> Customer Satisfaction |
0.428 |
6.640 |
0 |
Supported |
H2 |
Esthetic Experience
-> Customer Satisfaction |
0.193 |
3.096 |
0.002 |
Supported |
H3 |
Education Experience
-> Customer Satisfaction |
0.112 |
1.742 |
0.082 |
Not Supported |
H4 |
Escapism Experience
-> Customer Satisfaction |
0.286 |
4.644 |
0 |
Supported |
H5 |
Customer Satisfaction
-> Customer Loyalty |
0.834 |
35.606 |
0 |
Supported |
Source: Data
Processing of Smart PLS 3
Referring
to Table 8, it can be inferred that except for H3, all other hypotheses are
supported meaning that there is significant relationship between two variables
where P-values are less than 0.05 and T-statistics are greater than 1.96.
For
H1, based on table 8 above, it can be seen that the P-value is 0 and the
T-statistics result is 6.640 > 1.960 so that there is a significant
influence between Entertainment Experience on Customer Satisfaction on visitors
to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area. While the Path Coefficient of
Entertainment Experience value on Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the
Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area shows an Original Sample (O) value of
0.428, which means that the Entertainment Experience on Customer Satisfaction
on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area has a positive
relationship between those variables.
Customers
who visit that area enjoy facilities provided. The Floating Market Lembang
tourist area does offer several activities that can be categorized as an
Entertainment Experience because of their nature that requires passive
participation and high absorption, such as the Rabbit Park and Miniature Train.
This
is in line with the research results of (Molina-G�mez, Mercad�-Mel�, Almeida-Garc�a, &
Ruiz-Berr�n, 2021), (Qu, 2017), and (Huang & Yang, 2018) which show a
significant influence between the Entertainment Experience variable on Customer
Satisfaction.
For
H2, based on Table 8� above, it can be seen that the P-value is 0.002 and the T-statistics result is
3.096 > 1.960 so that there is a significant effect between the Esthetic
Experience on Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market
Tourism Area. While the Path Coefficient of the value of Esthetic Experience on
Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area
shows an Original Sample (O) value of 0.193, which means that the Esthetic
Experience of Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market
Tourism Area has a positive relationship between those variables.
The Floating Market Lembang tourist area offers
rides that are classified as Esthetic Experience, such as Rainbow Garden, Mini
City, and Kyoto Park. Those rides offer unique layout that
supports esthetics that is harmony in nuance. It makes people enjoy the view of
those rides or gardens making them feel like in real situation of those rides.
This experience makes customers satisfied.
This is in line with the research results of �(Molina-G�mez et al., 2021), (Qu, 2017), (Mahdzar et al., 2017) and (Ali, Hussain, & Ragavan, 2014),
which shows a significant
influence between the Esthetic Experience variables on Customer Satisfaction.
For
H4, based on Table 9, it can be seen that the P-value is 0 and the
T-statistics is 4.644 > 1.960 so that there is a significant effect between
Escapism Experience on Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang
Floating Market Tourism Area. While the Path Coefficient of Escapism Experience
value on Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism
Area shows an Original Sample (O) value of 0.286, which means that Escapism
Experience on Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market
Tourism Area has a positive relationship between those variables.
The tourist area of
Floating Market Lembang is located in a highland
area that is identified with beautiful and calm natural scenery. One of the
global trip recommendation articles even mentions that Lembang is The Tranquil
Place or a quiet place. This beautiful and quiet area is very common as a
tourist destination, especially for people who live in densely populated urban
areas with high mobility. This situation makes it a right place
to escape from customers� regular activity.
This is in line with the research results of (Molina-G�mez et al., 2021), (Zhang, Song, & Park, 2016),
and (Coetzee, 2015) which show a significant
influence between Escapism Experience variables on Customer Satisfaction.
For
H5, based on table
8, it can be seen that the
P-value is 0 and the T-statistics result is 35,606 > 1,960 so that H0 is
rejected and Ha is accepted. Thus, there is a significant effect between
Customer Satisfaction on Customer Loyalty on visitors to the Lembang Floating
Market Tourism Area. While the Path Coefficient of Customer Satisfaction value
to Customer Loyalty for visitors to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area
shows an Original Sample (O) value of 0.834, which means that Customer
Satisfaction towards Customer Loyalty for visitors to the Lembang Floating
Market Tourism Area has a positive relationship between those
variables.
This is in line with the research results of (Molina-G�mez et al., 2021), (El-Adly, 2019), (Gul, 2014), (Zhang et al., 2016), and (Tonapa & Kurniawati, 2022) which show a
significant influence between the Customer Satisfaction variables. towards
Customer Loyalty.
For
H3, based on Table 8, it can be seen that the P-value is 0.082 and the
T-statistics result is 1.742 < 1.960 so that H0 is accepted and Ha is
rejected. Thus, there is no significant effect between Education Experience on
Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area.
While the Path Coefficient of Education Experience value on Customer
Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area shows an
Original Sample (O) value of 0.112, which means that Education Experience on
Customer Satisfaction on visitors to the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area
has a positive relationship between those variables.
The
results of this study did not show the same results as the study by (Molina-G�mez et al., 2021), which shows that
there is a significant influence between the Education Experience variable on
Customer Satisfaction even though the influence value is the smallest among the
other four variables. However, research (Yogi, 2018) show the same
results as the research results, that Education Experience does not have a
significant effect on Customer Satisfaction�
(Tonapa & Kurniawati, 2022).
Theoretically
the possibility of this result occurs because the Lembang Floating Market
Tourism Area is described as a tourist destination for entertainment, where the
role of education displayed in several rides is not the main focus of visitors
who come.
Element
of Education Experience in the Lembang Floating Market Tourism Area can be seen
from the rides in the Mini City, such as Professional Games.
Conclusion
Based on the result of
this study, the authority or manager of Floating Market Lembang tourism can improve some
part of the site. Among four variables of Experience Economy, other than
Education Experience variable
have positive and significant impact on Customer Satisfaction. Customers prefer
enjoying situation and facilities to learning things in that tourism area.
Therefore, strategy and improvement should be directed more on those areas
rather than education aspect. They come to Floating
Market Lembang
to have entertainment and escape from their routine daily activity. The manager
should be more creative to set the aesthetic of each ride, make them more
similar to the original shape. For example, European and Japanese style of
houses and garden, by increasing the aesthetic aspect will make nuance of
Europe and Japan like the real Europe and Japan that in turn will make
customers feel as if they are in real Europe and Japan. They will feel escaping
from their daily activity, they will immerse into worth situation.
Another example of implementation that can be
taken by manager regarding finding of this study is, by improving entertainment
aspect, since Entertainment Experience
variable has also positive and significant impact on Customer Satisfaction.
Manager should think creatively to add more rides related to entertainment and
fun, so that tourists can have more choices to play covering children, teenager
even adult. The rides and playing ground should be created with criteria as
match as possible with the needs of respective age group.
Ali,
Faizan, Hussain, Kashif, & Ragavan, Neethiahnanthan Ari. (2014). Romance of
Experience, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions: An Empirical Examination of
International Delegates in Academic Conferences. SHS Web of Conferences,
12, 1009. EDP Sciences. Google Scholar
Coetzee,
Zelmari. (2015). Exploring consumer experiences in guest houses in South
Africa: an experience economy approach. University of Pretoria. Google Scholar
El-Adly,
Mohammed Ismail. (2019). Modelling the relationship between hotel perceived
value, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, 50, 322�332. Google Scholar
Gul,
Roshana. (2014). The relationship between reputation, customer satisfaction,
trust, and loyalty. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 4(3),
368�387. Google Scholar
Huang,
Biing Wen, & Yang, Yu Chen. (2018). The Effects of Leisure Agricultural
Experience Activities on Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from Different
Tourist Styles in Taiwan. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 7,
260�268. Google Scholar
Indonesia,
C. N. N. (2020). Indonesia, C. 2020. CNN Berita Makro. Retrieved April 8, 2021,
from CNN Indonesia: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20200226121314-532-478265/menghitung-kontribusi-sektor-pariwisata-bagi-ekonomi-ri.
CNN Indonesia. Google Scholar
Mahdzar,
Mazlina, Izhar, Farah S., Wee, Hassnah, Ghani, Arni A., Hamid, Zuliah A., &
Anuar, Nor Asmalina M. (2017). Measuring experience economy and satisfaction:
An examination of visitors in agricultural park. Advanced Science Letters,
23(8), 7574�7577. Google Scholar
Molina-G�mez,
Jes�s, Mercad�-Mel�, Pere, Almeida-Garc�a, Fernando, & Ruiz-Berr�n, Raquel.
(2021). New perspectives on satisfaction and loyalty in festival tourism: The
function of tangible and intangible attributes. PloS One, 16(2),
e0246562. Google Scholar
Qu,
Kangli. (2017). The impact of experience on satisfaction and revisit intention
in theme parks: An application of the experience economy. Graduate Theses
and Dissertations, 15609. Google Scholar
Rosenberg,
Larry J., & Czepiel, John A. (1984). A marketing approach for customer
retention. Journal of Consumer Marketing. Google Scholar
Sugiyono,
M. P. P., & Kuantitatif, P. (2009). Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung:
Alfabeta. Cet. Vii. Google Scholar
Tonapa,
Marilyn, & Kurniawati, Kurniawati. (2022). Pengaruh Dimensi Experience
Economy terhadap Augmented Reality Advertising Satisfaction dan Dimensi
Behavioral Intention. Benefit: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 6(2),
128�150. Google Scholar
White,
H. (2007). Problem-based learning in introductory science across disciplines. Diakses
Tanggal, 27. Google Scholar
Yogi,
Persada Gubta. (2018). Pengaruh Experience Economy Dengan Konsep Pine Dan
Gilmore Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan (Survey terhadap konsumen Transmart di Kota
Padang). Universitas Andalas. Google Scholar
Zhang,
YunYao, Song, HakJun, & Park, Keun Soo. (2016). A study on tourists
experiences and satisfaction to macao casinos. 관광연구저널, 30(10),
83�95. Google Scholar
Maris Agung Triandewo, Klemens Wedanaji Prasastyo, Alfira Azzahra (2023) |
First publication right : Journal of Business, Social and Technology (Bustechno) |
This article is licensed under: |