Life Cycle Environmental Performance of B100 Biodiesel from Reutealis Trisperma (Kemiri Sunan): An Integrated Carbon Payback Period and Nature-Based Solutions Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i3.688Keywords:
B100 biodiesel, Carbon Payback Period, Kemiri Sunan, Life Cycle Assessment, Reutealis TrispermaAbstract
Background: Rising greenhouse gas emissions have increased the need for sustainable biofuels. Biodiesel from the non-edible feedstock Reutealis trisperma (kemiri sunan) offers a low-carbon alternative compatible with marginal lands under the Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) framework.
Objective: This study evaluates the environmental performance of B100 biodiesel production from kemiri sunan and quantifies the effects of renewable energy integration on emission reduction, energy efficiency, and carbon payback.
Methods: A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using a cradle-to-gate system boundary (functional unit: 1 liter of B100 biodiesel) was conducted using OpenLCA with the Ecoinvent 3.11 database, ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H), IPCC 2013, and Cumulative Energy Demand methods. The assessment covered the entire production chain from cultivation to bio-additive blending.
Results: The carbon emissions of kemiri sunan B100 biodiesel were 2.04 kg CO₂-eq per liter, which were significantly lower than those of fossil diesel (3,400 kg CO₂-eq/ton) and comparable to palm oil biodiesel (1,659 kg CO₂-eq/ton). Transitioning to solar photovoltaic (PV) electricity reduced emissions by 56% (from 2.02 to 0.74 kg CO₂-eq). Energy balance indicators, including Net Energy Gain (NEG), Net Energy Ratio (NER), and Specific Energy Consumption (SEC), confirmed a positive energy output-to-input ratio. The Carbon Payback Period (CPP) was estimated at 11 years when using PLN electricity and was shortened to 6 years with solar PV integration.
Conclusion: Kemiri sunan B100 biodiesel demonstrates strong potential as a sustainable, non-edible bioenergy source that supports low-carbon energy transitions. The integration of renewable energy, optimized cultivation management, and the utilization of degraded lands collectively enhance its environmental performance and strengthen the effectiveness of NbS implementation.
References
Azadi, H., Barati, A. A., Nazari Nooghabi, S., & Scheffran, J. (2022). Climate-related disasters and agricultural land conversion: Towards prevention policies. Climate and Development, 14(9), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.2008291
Chun, Y., Kim, I., & Jeon, E.-C. (2026). Evaluating the Carbon Payback Period of Nature-Based Solutions: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach. Nature-Based Solutions, 100310. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NBSJ.2026.100310
Cook-Patton, S. C., Leavitt, S. M., Gibbs, D., Harris, N. L., Lister, K., Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., Briggs, R. D., Chazdon, R. L., Crowther, T. W., & Ellis, P. W. (2020). Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature, 585(7826), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x
Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M. D., Wagner, N., & Gorini, R. (2019). The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006
Global Temperature - Earth Indicator - NASA Science. (2021). Retrieved November 12, 2025, from https://science.nasa.gov/earth/explore/earth-indicators/global-temperature/
GSR 2025 | RENEWABLE ENERGY IN TRANSPORT. (2025). Retrieved November 12, 2025, from https://www.ren21.net/gsr-2025/sectors/transport/
Haase, M., Wulf, C., Baumann, M., Rösch, C., Weil, M., Zapp, P., & Naegler, T. (2022). Prospective assessment of energy technologies: a comprehensive approach for sustainability assessment. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00344-6
Hajian, M., & Kashani, S. J. (2021). Evolution of the concept of sustainability. From Brundtland Report to sustainable development goals. In Sustainable resource management (pp. 1–24). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00018-3
Herman, M., Hafif, B., Ferry, Y., Aunillah, A., Firdaus, N. K., Listyati, D., & Pranowo, D. (2023). The prospect of kemiri sunan (Reutalis trisperma B. airy shaw) development as a source of bio-oil from inedible crops. E3S Web of Conferences, 373, 4017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337304017
Hernández-Morcillo, M., Burgess, P., Mirck, J., Pantera, A., & Plieninger, T. (2018). Scanning agroforestry-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy, 80, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.013
Huijbregts, M. A. J., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Elshout, P. M. F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Zijp, M., Hollander, A., & Van Zelm, R. (2017). ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
Jo, H.-K., & Park, H.-M. (2017). Changes in growth rate and carbon sequestration by age of landscape trees. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 45(5), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.5.097
Kao, Y.-L., & Chen, J.-Y. (2025). Exploring the Purchase Intention of Electric Vehicles Through the UTAUT 2 Model. 2025 1st International Conference on Consumer Technology (ICCT-Pacific), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT-PACIFIC63901.2025.11012759
Lovasz, A., Sabau, N. C., Borza, I., & Brejea, R. (2023). Production and quality of biodiesel under the influence of a rapeseed fertilization system. Energies, 16(9), 3728. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093728
Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., Haase, D., Jones-Walters, L., Keune, H., & Kovacs, E. (2017). The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
Sala, S., Laurent, A., Vieira, M., & Van Hoof, G. (2020). Implications of LCA and LCIA choices on interpretation of results and on decision support. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(12), 2311–2314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01845-2
Siregar, K., Tambunan, A. H., Irwanto, A. K., Wirawan, S. S., & Araki, T. (2015). A comparison of life cycle assessment on oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) and physic nut (Jatropha curcas Linn.) as feedstock for biodiesel production in Indonesia. Energy Procedia, 65, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.01.054
Sucahyo, L., Ardelia, L. P., Purwanti, N., & Virgian, S. (2025). Energy Balance Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Biodiesel Production from Philippine Tung (Reutealis trisperma) Oil in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1513(1), 12019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1513/1/012019
Tibesigwa, T., Iezzi, B., Lim, T. H., Kirabira, J. B., & Olupot, P. W. (2023). Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from selected second-generation feedstocks. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 13, 100614. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLET.2023.100614
Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), 1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kiki Hakiki, Dedi Priadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


