Evaluating Transparency and Fairness in Booth Registration and Curation Decision-Making at Comic Frontier: A Multi-Method Approach

Penina Annais; Utomo Sarjono Putro

doi:10.59261/jbt.v7i1.583

Authors

Penina Annais Institut Teknologi Bandung
Utomo Sarjono Putro Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i1.583

Keywords:

comic frontier, event management, exhibitor experience, gap analysis, kepner-tregoe, registration system

Abstract

Background: The rapid growth of pop culture conventions has intensified competition and heightened expectations for transparent and efficient exhibitor registration systems. Comic Frontier, one of Indonesia's largest pop culture events, has faced recurring exhibitor dissatisfaction concerning booth registration and curation processes.

Objective: This study seeks to identify gaps between exhibitor expectations and experiences, determine root causes of complaints, examine best practices from comparable events, and propose strategic improvements for a more effective system.

Methods: A mixed-method approach was applied. Quantitative data from 120 respondents were analyzed using gap analysis, ANOVA, and descriptive statistics. Qualitative insights were obtained through 12 semi-structured interviews and two Focus Group Discussions (14 participants), structured using the Kepner-Tregoe method and prioritized via Pareto analysis. Instrument reliability exceeded Cronbach's alpha of 0.70. A weighting matrix assessed the relative impact of root causes.

Results: Significant perception gaps were identified, particularly in transparency of curation criteria (mean gap = 1.42) and clarity of registration timelines (mean gap = 1.31). ANOVA revealed significant differences in satisfaction across experience levels (F(2, 117) = 8.74, p < 0.01, η² = 0.13), indicating disproportionate disadvantages for newcomers. Structural constraints—rapid applicant growth versus limited organizational capacity—were identified as primary causes. Benchmarking emphasized structured timelines and clear criteria as critical trust-building mechanisms.

Conclusion: The study proposes a structured transparent registration framework as a short-term solution and an integrated digital platform as a long-term strategy. These measures are expected to enhance fairness, reduce uncertainty, and strengthen governance in large-scale cultural event management.

References

Abdul Gapor, S., Chin, C. H., Ngian, E. T., Wong, W. P. M., Kiew, J. P., & Toh, T. L. (2024). Cultural events’ service quality, satisfaction and loyalty: a case on an annual cultural diversity event in Borneo. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 15(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-07-2023-0054

Alfassi, R., Cooper, A., Mitchell, Z., Calabro, M., Shaer, O., & Mokryn, O. (2025). Fanfiction in the Age of AI: Community Perspectives on Creativity, Authenticity and Adoption. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2531272

Alharbi, A. M., Alshammari, A. A., & Naqvi, H. A. (2022). The gap between the perceptions and expectations of quality of services delivered to the participants at the scientific conferences using the University of Hafr Al Batin as a model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 909489.

Aol, L. (2024). Role of arts and cultural events in community development and social cohesion. International Journal of Arts, Recreation and Sports, 3(3), 39–51.

Auliamarsia, A. R., Meisyahritaa, T. D., Jayawardhana, I., & Dewantara, M. H. (2022). Penggunaan Multi Metodologi dalam Peningkatan Event Running.

Bakas, F. E., Duxbury, N., Remoaldo, P. C., & Matos, O. (2019). The social utility of small-scale art festivals with creative tourism in Portugal. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 10(3), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-02-2019-0009

Choi, J. O., Herbsleb, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2019). Trust-building across networks through festival organizing. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies-Transforming Communities, 300–305.

de Berardinis, J., Porcaro, L., Merono-Penuela, A., Cangelosi, A., & Buckley, T. (2025). Towards responsible AI Music: An investigation of trustworthy features for creative systems. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2503.18814. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.18814

Dellyana, D., Arina, N., & Fauzan, T. R. (2023). Digital innovative governance of the Indonesian creative economy: A governmental perspective. Sustainability, 15(23), 16234.

Erhan, T. P., & Bangun, C. R. A. (2024). Investigating the Impact of Event Experience on Satisfaction and Behavioural Intention of Music Event Audiences. Matrik: Jurnal Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 18(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.24843/MATRIK:JMBK.2024.v18.i01.p05

Huang, S., Yang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Ju, P. (2020). A study on exhibition evaluation system from the perspective of exhibitor. J. Serv. Sci. Manag, 13, 420–434.

Imbernon, U., del Mar Casanovas-Rubio, M., Monteiro, C., & Armengou, J. (2024). Towards transparent decision-making processes within museums: Case study of Museu Nacional d′ Art de Catalunya (MNAC). Evaluation and Program Planning, 103, 102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102405

Kourkouridis, D., Frangopoulos, I., & Salepaki, A. (2024). Post-Pandemic Trade Fair Dynamics: A Longitudinal Study Of Exhibitors’views On Digital And Hybrid Trade Fairs. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 55(3), 1174–1185.

Kusumorasri, I., Prihartini, N. S., & Sunarto, B. (2020). Optimizing Curatorial Rules in Performing Arts Festival: Strategy to Sustain Cultural Values in Disruptive Era. KnE Social Sciences, 557–564. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i12.7630

Lovato, J., Zimmerman, J. W., Smith, I., Dodds, P., & Karson, J. L. (2024). Foregrounding artist opinions: A survey study on transparency, ownership, and fairness in AI generative art. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 7(1), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31691

Mansur, S., Saragih, N., Novianti, W., Istiyanto, S. B., & Mahligai, U. (2022). Commodification of Betawi culture of Palang Pintu festival. Informasi, 52(1), 97–118.

O. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860

Overney, C., Moe, C., Chang, A., & Gillani, N. (2025). BoundarEase: Fostering Constructive Community Engagement to Inform More Equitable Student Assignment Policies. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 1–37.

Wahyudi, M. E. A., & Dellyana, D. (2024). Redefining General Public Segment In Kustomfest: A Research On Visitor Motives In Attending A Kustom Kulture Festival. Journal of Consumer Studies and Applied Marketing, 2(2), 156–164.

Wang, P., Liang, L., Pan, Y., Wang, Y., Li, L., Chen, Y., & Tian, Y. (2022). Relationship quality and exhibitors’ sustainable willingness to participate in exhibitions: A sociocultural perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 949625.