The Single Presence Policy for Rural Banks

Bachtiar Marbun

doi:10.59261/jbt.v7i2.621

Authors

Bachtiar Marbun Ekuitas University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i2.621

Keywords:

commercial bank, rural bank, single presence policy

Abstract

Background: Indonesian banking regulation has undergone significant structural transformation with the enactment of OJK Regulation No. 12/POJK.03/2020. This regulatory shift raises critical legal questions about its implications for Rural Bank institutions.

Objective: This research aims to understand and examine the single presence policy for Rural Banks, which is predicted to be implemented, and to determine the consequences of the single presence policy regulation after the issuance of the Commercial Bank Consolidation POJK.

Methods: The research methods applied include qualitative research with normative legal methods, employing statute and conceptual approaches to analyze primary legal materials, including Bank Indonesia Regulations, OJK Regulations, and the P2SK Law (Law No. 4/2023).

Results: The single presence policy for Rural Banks is predicted to be implemented with the aim of increasing banking stability, resilience, and competitiveness at the national level, as well as facilitating digital revitalization in the financial industry. Regarding the harmonization of bank control regulations through controlling shareholders, the Commercial Bank Consolidation POJK also regulates changes related to the minimum capital requirements for bank tier thresholds. The current core capital requirements are as regulated in Article 147, paragraph (1) of the Republic of Indonesia Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 12/POJK.03/2021 concerning Commercial Banks, which are grouped into 4 (four) KBMI.

Conclusion: The emergence of the single presence policy is unsuitable and irrelevant for banking, especially for BPR, considering that the history of the formation of BPR, which aimed to help people in rural areas, is contrary to the single presence policy.

References

Achmad, A. S., & Indradewi, A. A. (2021). Hubungan Hukum Antar Perusahaan Dalam Sistem Perusahaan Grup Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(2), 470–483. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.3912.

Antwi, F., Kong, Y., & Gyimah, K. N. (2024). Financial inclusion, competition and financial stability: New evidence from developing economies. Heliyon, 10(13).

Barkas, P. (2024). Consumer protection and financial innovation: Microeconomic, policy, and behavioral considerations for the digital era. In Finance, Growth and Democracy: Connections and Challenges in Europe and Latin America in the Era of Permacrisis: Democracy, Finance, and Growth (pp. 263–285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68475-3_17

Budisantoso, T. (2014). Nuritomo. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Carmichael, J., & Pomerleano, M. (2002). The development and regulation of non-bank financial institutions. World Bank Publications.

Djiwandono, S. (2006). Sejarah Bank Indonesia Periode IV: 1983-1997 Bank Indonesia pada masa Pembangunan dengan Pola Deregulasi. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Djumhana, M. (2008). Asas-asas hukum perbankan Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2015). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, cet. III. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, Hal, 34.

Harahap, M. Y. (2011). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2006. Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian.

Husen Sobana, H. D. (2016). Hukum perbankan di Indonesia. Pustaka Setia.

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 57, 295.

Ibrahim, J., & SH, M. (2020). Penerapan Single Presence Policydan Dampaknya Bagi Perbankan Nasional”. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 27(2).

Lee, R. E., & Bustaman, Y. (2024). Analysis of Corporate Governance, Market Concentration, And Diversification on Financial Stability In The Indonesian Banking Sector. 5th International Conference on Global Innovation and Trends in Economy 2024 (INCOGITE 2024), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-585-0_20

Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar, Yogyakarta: CV. Maha Karya Pustaka.

Nabella, R. S., Maski, G., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2020). Analisis risiko sistemik dan keterkaitan keuangan: Studi pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Perbanas Journal of Business and Banking, 10(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1441 4/jbb.v10i1.2048

Nayak, R. (2021). Banking regulations: do they matter for performance? R. Nayak. Journal of Banking Regulation, 22(4), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-021-00145-5

Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.

Suhardi, G. (2003). Usaha perbankan dalam perspektif hukum. Kanisius.

Sukarman, W., & Indonesia, L. P. (2014). Suatu Telaah Ekonomi-Politik, ctk. Pertama, Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, Jakarta.

Syafitri, Y. (2023). Implikasi Penerbitan Omnibus Law Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan (UU P2SK) Terhadap Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dalam Sektor Keuangan. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 860–867.

Uddin, G., Ashogbon, B., Martins, B., Momoh, O., Agbonrofo, H. E., Alika, S., & Oserei, K. (2021). The banking sector and national economy. Available at SSRN 3773912.

Vlašić, I. (2023). Ancient Middle East And The Roman World: The Question Of Banking Activity In Babylon And Banking In The Roman World. MEETING OF LEGAL CULTURES, 27.