Organizational Values and Culture as Drivers of Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Private Senior High Schools

Authors

  • Paulus Sunarjo Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Ahmad Mulyana Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Dudi Permana Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Erna Sofriana Imaningsih Universitas Mercu Buana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i2.642

Keywords:

strategic management, organizational culture, sustainable competitive advantage, school management, qualitative approach

Abstract

Background: Private senior high schools in Indonesia face intensifying competition driven by digital transformation, educational globalization, and rising stakeholder expectations. In this context, sustainable competitive advantage can no longer be built solely on physical resources but must be grounded in intangible strategic assets that are valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable.

Objective: This study analyzes the role of organizational values and culture in building sustainable competitive advantage in private senior high schools.

Methods: The research employs a qualitative approach with a multiple-case study design involving two leading private high schools in Jakarta. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (six informants from each school), field observation, and document analysis, and validated using triangulation techniques.

Results: The findings reveal that both private high schools develop strong organizational values as the foundation of their strategic management practices, which are subsequently implemented through structured student development programs. Despite differences in cultural orientation—one emphasizing discipline and academic excellence and the other focusing on holistic education and character development—both schools successfully translate their values into distinctive programs that enhance student outcomes and institutional reputation. Furthermore, continuous evaluation mechanisms and experiential learning activities play a significant role in sustaining program effectiveness.

Conclusion: This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence that organizational culture and value-based strategies function as critical intangible resources that drive sustainable competitive advantage in educational institutions. The findings also offer practical implications for school leaders in designing culturally grounded strategies to enhance school competitiveness.

References

Abbas, J., & Kumari, K. (2023). Examining the relationship between total quality management and knowledge management and their impact on organizational performance: a dimensional analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(2), 426–451.

Alateeg, S., & Alhammadi, A. (2024). The impact of organizational culture on organizational innovation with mediation role of strategic leadership in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 13(2), 843–858.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.

Barney, J. B., & Mackey, A. (2016). Text and metatext in the resource‐based view. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(4), 369–378.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Burhanuddin, B. (2019). The scale of school organizational culture in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1582–1595. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2018-0030

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Sage Publications, Inc. (5th ed., Issue 2).

David, F. R., David, F. R., & David, M. E. (2017). Strategic management: concepts and cases: A competitive advantage approach (Vol. 127). Pearson New Jersey.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.

Fuentes Salazar, J. M., Parcerisa, L., & Villalobos, C. (2025). UNESCO’s Global Governance in the School Education: A Scoping Review. Spanish Journal of Comparative Education/Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 46. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.46.2025.41423

Fullan, M. (2007). Leading in a culture of change. John Wiley & Sons.

Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2021). Science mapping the knowledge base in educational leadership and management: A longitudinal bibliometric analysis, 1960 to 2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 5–30.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2009). Competitiveness and Globalization.

Huberman, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook.

Kurniasari, A., Herdinata, C., & Bungin, B. (2025). The Role of Value Co-Creation On School Image and Parent Loyalty. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 10(3), 898–910.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. sage.

Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Pollock, K. (2017). How school leaders contribute to student success. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8

Liang, J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact by SJ Tracy, West Sussex, UK, John Wiley & Sons, 2019, Ltd. 368 pp., $115.50 (paperback), ISBN: 978-1-4051-9202-3. Taylor & Francis.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.

Sopian, R. M., & Suharto, M. (2025). Strategic Management for Strengthening the Competitiveness of State Islamic Elementary School in Lampung.

Souza, J. de F. (2024). UNESCO, World Bank, and OECD: global perspectives on the right to education and implications for the teaching profession. Educar Em Revista, 40, e94756. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0411.94756-T

Susilo, M. J., Kartowagiran, B., & Vehachart, R. (2018). Modeling of cultural effect on school autonomy at religion-based school in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 364–375.

Ulkhaq, M. M., Handayani, N. U., & Rahmat, T. O. (2026). Do quality assurance mechanisms work through quality culture or directly? Evidence on higher education performance from Indonesia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 1–19.

Wu, L.-F., Huang, I.-C., Huang, W.-C., & Du, P.-L. (2019). Aligning organizational culture and operations strategy to improve innovation outcomes: An integrated perspective in organizational management. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(2), 224–250.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.

Zhang, J., Jehangir, F. N., Yang, L., Tahir, M. A., & Tabasum, S. (2025). Competitive advantage and firm performance: The role of organizational culture, organizational innovation, and knowledge sharing. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 3081–3107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01910-3

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29