Critical Analysis of Indonesia’s Cybersecuritization Discourse: Deconstructing the Identification of Securitizing Actors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i3.646Keywords:
Critical Literature Review, Cybersecuritization, Indonesia Cybersecurity, Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Securitization Theory, Speech ActAbstract
Background: The discussion regarding Securitization Theory in academic literature about state reactions to digital threats is growing alongside the development of Indonesia's digital threat landscape. Yet, this study highlights a methodological shortcoming: existing literature often derives from overly simplistic theories, treating securitization as a mere contextual phenomenon rather than assuming it as an active constructivist frame.
Objective: By juxtaposing the structural grammar of the Copenhagen School theory with Myriam Dunn Cavelty’s concept of cybersecuritization, this paper critically engages with recent literature on Indonesia’s cybersecuritization.
Methods: Using a qualitative-descriptive Critical Literature Review, this study employs the existing academic discourse as its primary data source, addressing the need to deconstruct two fundamental theoretical building blocks of the concept of securitization—securitizing actors and speech acts.
Results: The findings indicate that previous research misapplied the concept of the speech act, taking routine political (locutionary) rhetoric literally and failing to deconstruct its illocutionary intent, contextual purpose, or sequentiality. Moreover, the literature remains grounded in traditional, realist models of "existential threats" and tends to overlook technocratic, risk-management practices and non-traditional actors that characterize modern cybersecurity governance. In conclusion, this study advocates for a methodological recommitment, recommending that researchers combine language-specific indicators with features unique to the digital environment.
Conclusion: Acknowledging its focused scope on actors and speech acts, this paper recommends that future research explore the remaining components of the cybersecuritization framework to achieve a complete and dynamic understanding of Indonesia's digital security institutionalization.
References
Aji, M. P. (2025). Cybersecurity Politics in Building Cyber Sovereignty in Indonesia Through Strengthening the Role of the National Cyber and Crypto Agency. Society, 13(2), 1056–1071. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i2.960
Aji, M. P., Somantri, G. R., & Rofii, M. S. (2025). Building Cyber Sovereignty in Indonesia Through Revitalization of the National Cyber and Crypto Agency of the Republic of Indonesia. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 1275–1283. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.1771
Arianto, A. R., & Anggraini, G. (2025). Pembentukan TNI Angkatan Siber dalam Perspektif Teori Geometripolitisasi (Mazhab Indonesia) dan Sekuritisasi (Mazhab Kopenhagen) terhadap Ruang Siber di Indonesia untuk Menghadapi Perang Siber Global. Ilmu Dan Budaya, 46(2), 109–125.
Azis, A. A., & Azhari, M. I. (2025). Illegal online gambling in Indonesia: Assessing state securitization and its effectiveness. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 14(1), 1–14.
Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Cavelty, M. D. (2012). The militarisation of cyberspace: Why less may be better. 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CYCON 2012), 1–13.
Cavelty, M. D., & Egloff, F. J. (2019). The politics of cybersecurity: Balancing different roles of the state. St Antony’s International Review, 15(1), 37–57.
Collins, A. (2022). Contemporary security studies. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Sage Publications, Inc. (5th ed., Issue 2).
Dunn Cavelty, M. (2013). From cyber-bombs to political fallout: Threat representations with an impact in the cyber-security discourse. International Studies Review, 15(1), 105–122.
Dunn Cavelty, M., & Wenger, A. (2020). Cybersecurity meets security politics: Complex technology, fragmented politics, and networked science. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1678855
Fauzi, E., Citra, H., Marwenny, E., & Alfitrianti, N. (2024). Control of Personal Data and Cyber Space by Global Digital Platforms in Relation to Indonesia’s Digital Sovereignty. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 4(1), 149–157.
Febriawan, D., & Marisa, H. (2024). Understanding Indonesia’s cybersecurity policies: Opportunities and challenges in the digitalization transformation era. JOELS: Journal of Election and Leadership, 5(1), 13–21.
Hansen, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Digital disaster, cybersecurity, and the Copenhagen School. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1155–1175.
Juned, M., Martin, A., & Pratama, N. (2024). Bjorka’s Hacktivism in Indonesia: The Intercourse Paradox of Cyberdemocracy, Cyberactivism, and Cybersecurity. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 13(5), 369–380.
Kurniawan, Y. (2018). The politics of securitization in democratic Indonesia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62482-2
Lee, A. (2020). Online hoaxes, existential threat, and internet shutdown: a case study of securitization dynamics in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(1), 17–34.
Prayudi, P., Budiman, A., Ardipandanto, A., & Fitri, A. (2018). Keamanan siber dan pembangunan demokrasi di Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI.
Putri, T. E. (2023). Government Securitizing Effort of Online Harmful Content in Indonesia. Komunikasi: Jurnal Komunikasi, 14(2), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.31294/jkom.v14i2.12018
Qiao-Franco, G. (2024). An emergent community of cyber sovereignty: the reproduction of boundaries? Global Studies Quarterly, 4(1), ksad077. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksad077
Rai, I. N. A. S., Heryadi, D., & Kamaluddin, A. (2022). The Role of Indonesia to Create Security and Resilience in Cyber Spaces [Peran Indonesia dalam Membentuk Keamanan dan Ketahanan di Ruang Siber]. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional, 13(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v13i1.2641
Reindl, A. P. (1998). Choosing Law in Cyberspace: Copyright Conflicts on Global Networks. Michigan Journal of International Law, 19(3), 799–871.
Stritzel, H. (2007). Towards a theory of securitization: Copenhagen and beyond. European Journal of International Relations, 13(3), 357–383.
Taylor, R. D. (2022). Preserving human rights across the digital domain. Available at SSRN 4178327.
Vuori, J. A. (2008). Illocutionary logic and strands of securitization: Applying the theory of securitization to the study of non-democratic political orders. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 65–99.
Wibowo, S. E., Hartono, A., Kiswanto, H., Louerens, J. T. A., & Primawanti, H. (2024). Securitization of Cyber Threats to the Indonesian Government: A Study of Cyber Defense Strategy. Global Political Studies Journal, 8(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.34010/gpsjournal.v8i2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kamil Ghiffary A, Hartanto, Ivandra Solihin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
