Risk Mitigation Strategies for Raw Material Supply in the Animal Feed Industry in Response to Climate Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i2.660Keywords:
AHP, climate change, house of risk, SCOR, supply chain riskAbstract
Background: The animal feed industry is highly dependent on agricultural raw materials such as corn, rice bran, and fine bran, which account for approximately 85–90% of total production costs. Climate change in Indonesia, characterized by unpredictable rainfall patterns and extreme weather conditions, increases supply chain risks by adversely affecting agricultural productivity.
Objective: This study aims to identify and assess supply chain risks at PT XYZ associated with climate change. Specifically, it seeks to formulate evidence-based mitigation strategies to enhance supply chain resilience in the animal feed industry.
Methods: This research was conducted during the first quarter of 2025 using both primary and secondary data. The analysis integrated the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR), House of Risk (HOR), and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods.
Results: The findings indicate that climate variability significantly affects raw material availability, price volatility, and supply sustainability. The proposed mitigation strategies include supplier diversification, safety stock management, and the strengthening of risk monitoring systems.
Conclusion: These strategies are expected to improve supply chain resilience in the animal feed industry.
References
Change, I. P. O. C. (2001). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Genebra, Suíça.
Chen, C.-T., Lin, C.-T., & Huang, S.-F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301.
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53–61.
Coradi, P. C., Chaves, J. B. P., Flores, M. M., & Teixeira, L. F. A. (2025). Effects of corn grain storage conditions on the mycotoxins production, physicochemical and microbiological quality of processed feed and food safety in the poultry production chain. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition, 7(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-025-00342-z
Halmemies-Beauchet-Filleau, A., Rinne, M., Lamminen, M., Mapato, C., Ampapon, T., Wanapat, M., & Vanhatalo, A. (2018). Alternative and novel feeds for ruminants: nutritive value, product quality and environmental aspects. Animal, 12(s2), s295–s309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002252
Higuita, N. I. A., LaRocque, R., & McGushin, A. (2023). Climate change, industrial animal agriculture, and the role of physicians–Time to act. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 13, 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100260
Khanal, P., Dhakal, R., Khanal, T., Pandey, D., Devkota, N. R., & Nielsen, M. O. (2022). Sustainable livestock production in Nepal: A focus on animal nutrition strategies. Agriculture, 12(5), 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050679
Kim, S. W., Less, J. F., Wang, L., Yan, T., Kiron, V., Kaushik, S. J., & Lei, X. G. (2019). Meeting global feed protein demand: challenge, opportunity, and strategy. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 7(1), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014838
Michalk, D. L., Kemp, D. R., Badgery, W. B., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Thomassin, P. J. (2019). Sustainability and future food security—A global perspective for livestock production. Land Degradation & Development, 30(5), 561–573.
Mukesh, M., Gujar, G., & Sodhi, M. (2022). Livestock sector: an integral component for country’s food and social security. In Advances in Animal Experimentation and Modeling (pp. 341–351). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90583-1.00033-7
Nuraeni, C., Sodiq, A., Setianto, N. A., Setyaningrum, A., & Widiyanti, R. (2025). Livestock business development strategies of beef cattle in Pangandaran District. Animal Production, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2025.27.1.291
Nyoman Pujawan, I., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003801
Pexas, G., Doherty, B., & Kyriazakis, I. (2023). The future of protein sources in livestock feeds: implications for sustainability and food safety. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1188467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1188467
Porfirio, L. L., Newth, D., Finnigan, J. J., & Cai, Y. (2018). Economic shifts in agricultural production and trade due to climate change. Palgrave Communications, 4(1).
Rauw, W. M., Gómez Izquierdo, E., Torres, O., García Gil, M., de Miguel Beascoechea, E., Rey Benayas, J. M., & Gomez-Raya, L. (2023). Future farming: protein production for livestock feed in the EU. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-023-00052-9
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process Mcgraw Hill, New York. Agricultural Economics Review, 70.
Uddin, M. E., & Kebreab, E. (2020). Impact of food and climate change on pastoral industries. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 543403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.543403
Van Huis, A., & Oonincx, D. G. A. B. (2017). The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review: The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37(5), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8
Wattie, Y., Suparno, O., & Raharja, S. (2024). Enhancing competitiveness in the Indonesian meat processing industry: a literature review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1358(1), 12042.
Zsidisin, G. A. (2003). A grounded definition of supply risk. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(5–6), 217–224.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irham Farhan Herdiardi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


