The Effect of Compensation and Workload on Employee Ethical Behavior at PT. XYZ in Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i3.674Keywords:
Compensation, Employees’ Ethical Behavior, Human Resource Management, PT. XYZ, WorkloadAbstract
Background: PT. XYZ is a national energy management and distribution company that applies Good Corporate Governance principles to ensure transparent and ethical operations. Despite improved employee compensation, the increasing number of ethical violation complaints over the past three years indicates ongoing challenges in maintaining employees' ethical behavior.
Objective: This study examines the effects of compensation and workload on employees' ethical behavior at PT. XYZ using Equity Theory and the Job Demands–Resources Model to explain how compensation fairness and the balance between job demands and organizational resources influence ethical behavior.
Methods: This study employs a quantitative method with a causal design, collecting data through Likert scale questionnaires distributed to 124 permanent employees of PT. XYZ. The variables analyzed include compensation and workload as independent variables, and employees' ethical behavior as the dependent variable. Data analysis is conducted using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the partial and simultaneous effects among the variables studied.
Results: The SEM-PLS analysis revealed that compensation has a positive and significant effect on employee ethical behavior (path coefficient = 0.655; T-statistic = 15.173; p < 0.05), while workload has a negative and significant effect (path coefficient = -0.480; T-statistic = 10.414; p < 0.05). Simultaneously, both variables explain 79% of the variation in employee ethical behavior (R² = 0.790), demonstrating a strong predictive model (SRMR = 0.037).
Conclusion: These findings confirm that fair compensation strengthens employee integrity, while excessive workload undermines ethical conduct. Organizations are advised to optimize compensation schemes and restructure workload distribution to cultivate a professional, ethical, and high-performance work environment.
References
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward An Understanding of Inequity (pp. 422–436). Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.
Armoti, A. Al, Abdullah, H., & Noor, A. S. (2022). Impact of business ethics on employee ’ s productivity and organization growth : Case study at Emaar Properties Corporation , Dubai , UAE. Asian Management and Business Review, 2(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.20885/AMBR.vol2.iss2.art3
Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2013). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (13th ed.). In Kogan Page Limited. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021496
Baljija, S. K., & Min, K. S. (2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of whistleblower protection: A new index. Data and Policy, 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2023.20
Bell, C. Y. (2025). Aligning Compensation System Strategies With Ethical Conduct : Aligning Compensation System Strategies With Ethical Conduct : Lessons From Call Centers. Compensation & Benefits Review, 57(July), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687251356525
Chenarboo, F. J., Hekmatshoar, R., & Fallahi, M. (2022). The influence of physical and mental workload on the safe behavior of employees in the automobile industry. Heliyon, 8(10), e11034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11034
Clercq, D. De, & Pereira, R. (2024). How overloaded employees can use resilience and forgiveness resources to overcome dissatisfaction and maintain their knowledge-sharing efforts. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, November. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-10-2023-4056
Cropanzano, R. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2015). Organizational Justice: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going. Oxford University Press, June, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981410.013.1
Demerouti, E., Nachreiner, F., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The Job Demands Resources Model of Burnout. In Journal of Applied Psychology (pp. 499–512).
Farooq, K., Yusliza, M. Y., Wahyuningtyas, R., Haque, A., & Muhammad, Z. (2021). Exploring Challenges and Solutions in Performing Employee Ecological Behaviour for a Sustainable Workplace. 1–19.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ) Using R. Springer.
Jayeoba, F. I., Genty, K. I., & Adeoye, A. O. (2025). Ethical Compensation and Employee Productivity. IGI Global, 171–190. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8819-8.ch009
Kavitha, S. (2025). The Impact of Human Resource Practices on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope (IRJMS), 6(September 2024), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2025.v06i01.02661
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kristinawati, D., & Galib, G. K. (2025). Strategic workload management in digital business : Lessons from a case study on internet service provider company. 5(1), 1–12.
Lavion, D. (2018). PwC’s global economic crime and fraud survey 2018. PwC. com.
Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior :an evidence-based approach (12th ed.). In McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Mukti, D. P., & Dudija, N. (2015). Organizational Change Dynamics : A Learning Organization Process toward World Class Organization. Isclo, 69–78.
Norina, S., & Sary, F. P. (2025). Ethical leadership and Gen Z : Enhancing work engagement through trust in Bandung city. 9(5), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.6891
Núñez-Sánchez, J. M., Molina-Gómez, J., Mercadé-Melé, P., & Almadana-Abón, S. (2024). Boosting Competitiveness Through the Alignment of Corporate Social Responsibility, Strategic Management and Compensation Systems in Technology Companies: A Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219480
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Prasetyo, I., Endarti, E. W., Endarto, B., Aliyyah, N., Rusdiyanto, Tjaraka, H., Kalbuana, N., & Rochman, A. S. (2021). Effect of compensation and discipline on employee performance: a case study Indonesia. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences, 48(6), 277–298. http://elibs.unigres.ac.id/id/eprint/723
Rahadi, D. R. (2023). Pengantar partial least squares structural equation model(pls- sem) (Issue August). Lentera Ilmu Madani.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior (15th ed.) Fifteenth Edition. In Pearson.
Saleem, A., Khurrum, M., Bhutta, S., Abrar, M., Waseem, M., & Bashir, M. (2024). Leader’s ethical behavior: A precursor to employees’ well-being through emotions management. Acta Psychologica, 249(June), 104453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104453
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). WILEY.
Sugiyono. (2023). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, KUALITATIF, DAN R&D (M. Dr. Ir. Sutopo. S.Pd (ed.); 2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Teshome, M. M., Meles, T. Y., & Yang, C. L. (2024). Productivity improvement through assembly line balancing by using simulation modeling in case of Abay garment industry Gondar. Heliyon, 10(1), e23585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23585
Velasquez, M. G. (2011). Business Ethics Concepts and Cases (7th ed.) Seventh Edition. Pearson.
Zayed, N. M., Rashid, M. M., Darwish, S., Faisal-E-Alam, M., Nitsenko, V., & Islam, K. M. A. (2022). The Power of Compensation System (CS) on Employee Satisfaction ( ES ): The Mediating Role of Employee. Economies.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lutfi Akbar Fauzi, Didin Kristinawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


