Job Hopping Dynamics Among Generation Z: The Influence of Emotional Exhaustion, Organizational Commitment, and Perceived Alternative Employment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i3.738Keywords:
Job Hopping, Emotional Exhaustion, Organizational Commitment, Perceived Alternative Employment, Generation ZAbstract
Background: Job hopping among Generation Z has become an increasingly important issue in human resource management, particularly amid the dynamic transformation of the labor market in Indonesia.
Objective: This study aims to examine the effects of emotional exhaustion and perceived alternative employment on job hopping behavior among Generation Z, with organizational commitment serving as a mediating variable.
Methods: The study is grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory and Social Exchange Theory (SET). A quantitative approach was employed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS. Data were collected from 262 Generation Z employees in the Greater Jakarta area who had changed jobs at least two to three times.
Results: The results indicate that emotional exhaustion and perceived alternative employment have significant positive effects on job hopping behavior, while organizational commitment has a significant negative effect on job hopping. Furthermore, perceived alternative employment positively influences organizational commitment, whereas emotional exhaustion does not significantly affect organizational commitment. Mediation analysis reveals that organizational commitment mediates the effect of perceived alternative employment on job hopping but does not mediate the relationship between emotional exhaustion and job hopping.
Conclusion: These findings contribute to the growing literature on Generation Z job hopping behavior and provide practical implications for organizations in designing more effective employee retention strategies.
References
Adelia, R., Susanto, E., & Haryono, T. (2024). Emotional exhaustion and turnover intention among Generation Z workers in Indonesia: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Indonesian Management, 12(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.22219/jim.v12i2.2024
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akkermans, J., Richardson, J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2020). The Covid-19 crisis as a career shock: Implications for careers and vocational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 103434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103434
Alghamdi, A. S. (2024). Evidence-based practices: using the touch points strategy to teach single-digit addition to students with ASD. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 39.
Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C., & Vardaman, J. M. (2010). Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.51827775
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bing, X., & Cai, J. (2026). Understanding the burnout experiences of female PhD students: A qualitative phenomenological study. Sage Open, 16(2), 21582440261442284.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?id=1mtqAAAAMAAJ
Boley, B. B. (2025). Conservation of Resources Theory: A new theory for the resident attitude literature. Annals of Tourism Research, 112, 103949.
Carter, W. R., Nesbit, P. L., Badham, R. J., Parker, S. K., & Sung, L. K. (2018). The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: A longitudinal field study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(17), 2483–2502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096
Chawla, P., & Lenka, U. (2022). Retaining Generation Z employees in the VUCA world: Examining the role of perceived employability and job embeddedness. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4), 1082–1099. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2021-2904
Claristia, M., & Etikariena, A. (2024). Organizational commitment and job hopping intention among Generation Z: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Jurnal Psikologi, 51(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.2024.51.1.33
De Rosa, A., Akkermans, J., Khapova, S. N., & Lo Presti, A. (2026). Career competencies: a meta-analysis of their antecedents and outcomes. Career Development International, 1–18.
Deloitte. (2023). Deloitte Global 2023 Gen Z and Millennial Survey: Waves of change — Moving from awareness to action. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/about/press-room/2023-gen-z-and-millenial-survey.html
Demerouti, E. (2025). Job demands-resources and conservation of resources theories: how do they help to explain employee well-being and future job design? Journal of Business Research, 192, 115296.
Gregoriou, A., Healy, J., & Koutmos, D. (2023). Organizational commitment, intention to leave and the moderating role of job satisfaction: Evidence from the financial sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(8), 1620–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2011145
Guo, Y., Jiang, Q., & Bian, W. (2026). Career shocks and career sustainability: the role of career crafting and perceived organizational support. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 38(3), 1131–1149.
Hadinejad, A., Esfandiar, K., & Skavronskaya, L. (2026). Advancing sustainable tourism behavioural research: A metacognitive perspective. Current Issues in Tourism, 29(8), 1609–1628.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
Jakarta, B. P. S. P. D. K. I. (2024). Profil Pekerja Provinsi DKI Jakarta 2023. In Profil Pekerja Provinsi DKI Jakarta (Vol. 5). BPS Provinsi DKI Jakarta. https://jakarta.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/11/29/a29e22b34b24c47e608039a1/profil-pekerja-provinsi-dki-jakarta-2023.html
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kock, N. (2026). Common method variation removal with target loadings: a new technique building on PLSF-SEM. Quality & Quantity, 1–26.
Li, X., Zakaria, N. H., Fang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2026). Abusive supervision and innovation performance: The role of organization-based self-esteem and deep acting. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 54(6), 1–11.
Li, Y., Wang, Z., & You, X. (2023). Social influence, perceived alternative employment opportunities, and turnover intention: A social learning perspective among young employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1089402
Liu, B., Ma, Y., Wang, H., Li, F., & Liu, G. (2024). Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis based on the perspective of multiple theories. Current Psychology, 43(6), 5341–5354.
Malinowska, D., Tokarz, A., & Wardzichowska, A. (2023). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of turnover intention among healthcare professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054132
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Parker, K., & Igielnik, R. (2020). On the Cusp of Adulthood and Facing an Uncertain Future: What We Know About Gen Z So Far. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/05/14/on-the-cusp-of-adulthood-and-facing-an-uncertain-future-what-we-know-about-gen-z-so-far/
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Qiao, Y., Fan, P., Li, F., & Chen, T. (2025). Learning and adaptation of transformational leaders: Linking transformational leadership to leader self‐efficacy for emotional regulation and work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 98(1), e70016.
Qin, X., Huang, M., Johnson, R. E., Hu, Q., & Ju, D. (2018). The Short-lived Benefits of Abusive Supervisory Behavior for Actors: An Investigation of Recovery and Work Engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1951–1975. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1325
Rubenstein, A. L., Eberly, M. B., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2018). Surveying the forest: A meta-analysis, moderator investigation, and future-oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover. Personnel Psychology, 71(1), 23–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12226
Triguero-Sánchez, R. (2026). Conceptualization and empirical validation of general organizational commitment and its links with ethical leadership and team participation. Discover Psychology, 6(1), 100.
Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L.-Q., & Bednall, T. C. (2019). Why Abusive Supervision Impacts Employee OCB and CWB: A Meta-Analytic Review of Competing Mediating Mechanisms. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2474–2497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318823935
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tio Ramadha Putra, Riani Rachmawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



