Cash Conversion Cycle and Profitability of Indonesian Property and Real Estate Companies: Quarterly Evidence across Pre-, During-, and Post-COVID-19 Periods

Authors

  • Anindita Putri Nurmalita Sari Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/bustechno.v7i4.745

Keywords:

Cash Conversion Cycle, Panel Data, Profitability, Property and Real Estate, System GMM, Working Capital Management

Abstract

extended development timelines and substantial working capital requirements, making effective working capital management a critical determinant of firms’ financial performance.

Objective: The present study investigates the effects of CCC and its sub-components on the financial performance of property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) over the 2017 Q2–2025 Q1 observation period.

Methods: The study uses quarterly panel data from 37 companies, comprising 1,184 firm-quarter observations. Financial performance is operationalized using Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q, while working capital management is measured using CCC, Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO), and Days Payable Outstanding (DPO). The analytical framework employs a Random Effects model with cluster-robust standard errors, supplemented by the two-step System Generalized Method of Moments (System GMM) estimator as a robustness check.

Results: Under the Random Effects model, CCC exhibits a negative and statistically significant association with ROA and ROE but has no significant relationship with Tobin’s Q. Both DIO and DPO are negatively and significantly associated with ROA and ROE, whereas DSO does not reach statistical significance. When estimated using System GMM, the effects of CCC, DIO, and DPO lose statistical significance after controlling for dynamic effects and potential endogeneity, while DSO exhibits a positive and statistically significant effect on ROA.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that working capital management is more strongly associated with accounting-based profitability than with market-based performance measures, with these associations weakening considerably when dynamic panel effects are incorporated into the estimation.

References

Aldubhani, M. A. Q., Wang, J., Gong, T., & Maudhah, R. A. (2022). Impact of working capital management on profitability: Evidence from listed companies in Qatar. Journal of Money and Business, 2(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMB-08-2021-0032

Balemi, N., Füss, R., & Weigand, A. (2021). COVID-19’s impact on real estate markets: Review and outlook. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 35(4), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-021-00384-6

Baltagi, B. H. (2026). A Companion to Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. In Springer Texts in Business and Economics: Part F1838. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09687-6

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (2023). Reprint of: Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.001

Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811241

Chang, C.-C. (2018). Cash conversion cycle and corporate performance: Global evidence. International Review of Economics & Finance, 56, 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.12.014

Croissant, Y. (2025). Microeconometrics with R. In Microeconometrics with R. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003100263

Cui, W. (2023). The Impact of COVID-19 on the Real Estate Market Based on Case and Data Analysis. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/15/20230928

Dananjaya, Y., Gunawan, H. M., & Potu, T. M. (2025). The 5 th International Conference on Entrepreneurship Capital Structure Across The Firm Life Cycle: A Moderating Role of Life Cycle in Indonesian Real Estate Sector. Proceedings of the International Conference on Entrepreneurship (IConEnt).

Enqvist, J., Graham, M., & Nikkinen, J. (2014). The impact of working capital management on firm profitability in different business cycles: Evidence from Finland. Research in International Business and Finance, 32, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2014.03.005

Galil, K., Lindner, T., Shapir, O. M., & Zeidan, R. (2026). Cash conversion cycle and bargaining power in the product market:A global perspective. Finance Research Letters, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2026.109775

Habib, A. M., & Kayani, U. N. (2022). Does the efficiency of working capital management affect a firm’s financial distress? Evidence from UAE. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(7), 1567–1586. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2021-0440

Harris, O., & Nguyen, T. (2024). Cyberattacks, cash conversion cycle, and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22688

Hatane, S. E., Winoto, J., Tarigan, J., & Jie, F. (2023). Working capital management and board diversity towards firm performances in Indonesia’s LQ45. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(2), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-11-2018-0130

Heriyanto, S., Nuryanto, U. W., Pratiwi, I., & Prihatin, J. (2023). Comparative Analysis Financial Performance of Property and Real Estate Sector Before and During Pandemic Covid-19 at Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.46254/af03.20220118

Huynh, T. X. T., Nguyen, T. T. H., & Nguyen, C. Van. (2025). The impact of working capital management on the financial performance of listed enterprises: an empirical evidence from Vietnam. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2473033

Iklimatu Adamu Umar, Ibrahim Hussaini, & Abubakar Yahaya Halad. (2023). Working Capital Management and Firm Profitability: An Empirical Review. Management Journal for Advanced Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.54741/mjar.3.3.2

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Karim, R., Mamun, M. A. Al, & Kamruzzaman, A. S. M. (2024). Cash conversion cycle and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing firms of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 8(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-03-2022-0033

Lyngstadås, H., & Berg, T. (2016). Working capital management: Evidence from Norway. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-01-2016-0012

Marzouk, M., & Hamdala, D. (2025). Phasing real estate projects considering profitability and customer satisfaction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(5), 2942–2970. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2022-1146

Naz, M. A., Ali, R., Rehman, R. U., & Ntim, C. G. (2022). Corporate governance, working capital management, and firm performance: Some new insights from agency theory. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(5), 1448–1461. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3466

Pereira, L., Ferreira, S., & Santos, J. (2020). The main causes of risk in residential real estate projects. Journal of General Management, 45(3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307019890095

Richards, V. D., & Laughlin, E. J. (1980). A cash conversion cycle approach to liquidity analysis. Financial Management, 9(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665310

Safira, S., & Yusnaini, Y. (2024). The Influence of Agency Cost, Intellectual Capital, Managerial Ownership, and Institutional Ownership on Firm Value with Financial Performance As a Moderating Variable in LQ45 Companies Listed on the BEI in 2020--2022. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i14.16097

Silalahi, D., Muda, I., & Absah, Y. (2025). The influence of capital structure, liquidity, and size on the intrinsic value of property companies. Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(4), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.55324/enrichment.v3i4.366

Witek, P., Hubar, Y., Jakubiak, M., & Maciuk, K. (2024). Analysis of the suburban real estate market in the period before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury Oddziału Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Krakowie, 52(1), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.24425/tkuia.2024.152201

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262232586/econometric-analysis-of-cross-section-and-panel-data/

Yamaka, W., Lomwanawong, S., Magel, D., & Maneejuk, P. (2022). Analysis of the lockdown effects on the economy, environment, and COVID-19 spread: Lesson learnt from a global pandemic in 2020. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912868

Yu, Z., Razzaq, A., Rehman, A., Shah, A., Jameel, K., & Mor, R. S. (2022). Disruption in global supply chain and socio-economic shocks: A lesson from COVID-19 for sustainable production and consumption. Operations Management Research, 15(1–2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00179-y

Downloads

Published

2026-10-05