Electricity Capacity Upgrade from 450 to 900 VA and Life Satisfaction of BPBL Recipients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/bustechno.v7i5.839Keywords:
BPBL Program, Electricity Capacity, Impact Evaluation, Life Satisfaction, Propensity Score MatchingAbstract
Background: Electricity is a basic necessity that supports household welfare. Through the New Electricity Connection Assistance Program (Bantuan Pasang Baru Listrik, BPBL), the Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources provides free electricity connections to underprivileged households. In 2023, the electricity capacity provided to BPBL recipients was increased from 450 volt-amperes (VA) to 900 VA.
Objective: This study examines whether the increase in electricity capacity is associated with differences in personal and social life satisfaction among BPBL recipients.
Methods: The study used primary survey data from 615 BPBL recipient households across the 2022 and 2023 cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using three methods: nearest-neighbor matching, radius caliper matching, and kernel matching. Matching quality was assessed based on covariate balance and common support.
Results: The increase in electricity capacity was consistently associated with higher social life satisfaction across all three matching methods, with estimated effects ranging from approximately 9% to 17%. For personal life satisfaction, a statistically significant effect was identified only using radius caliper matching, with an estimated effect of 7.5%; the estimates from nearest-neighbor and kernel matching were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The increase in electricity capacity from 450 VA to 900 VA showed a more robust association with social life satisfaction than with personal life satisfaction. Future evaluations should consider longer observation periods to assess whether benefits in the personal domain emerge over time.
References
Ananda. T. R., Feri, S., Novia, J., & Mochammad, I. A. (2023). Productivit & Psychology Well Being. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.54066/jikma.v1i4.505
Ayana, O. U., & Degaga, J. (2022). Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: A meta-regression analysis. International Review of Economics, 69(2), 209–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00391-7
Bühler, J. L., Scheling, L., Aebi, J. A., Lüdtke, O., & Orth, U. (2026). Life satisfaction and domain satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. European Journal of Personality, 40(4), 996–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070261423578
Burns, R. A., & Crisp, D. A. (2026). The development of single-item measures of Flourishing: the Brief Scales of Flourishing (BS-F). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 21(3), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2025.2502486
Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292050
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Forgeard, M. J. C., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v1i1.15
Gordon, J. A. (2024). Doing wellbeing policy: A discussion on public policy making for integrative prosperity. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12631
Grogan, L. (2018). Time use impacts of rural electrification: Longitudinal evidence from Guatemala. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.03.005
Gupta, T., Khan, M. T., & Negi, D. S. (2025). Agriculture, electrification and gendered time use in rural Bangladesh. Energy Economics, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108827
Han, P., Kimura, F., & Sandu, S. (2020). Household-level analysis of the impacts of electricity consumption on welfare and the environment in Cambodia: Empirical evidence and policy implications. Economic Modelling, 89, 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.11.025
Hong, M., Li, H., Wei, W., Chao, J., & Xia, J. (2025). Exploring the Relationship Between Residential Perceptions and Satisfaction: A Demographic Analysis in Wuhan, China. Land, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010129
Ikhsan, I., & Amri, K. (2022). Does electrification affect rural poverty and households’ non-food spending? Empirical evidence from western Indonesia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2095768
Joshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2020). The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: Analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 23(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-019-00998-w
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
Khoirunnisa, R., & Nurchayati, N. (2023). Kesejahteraan Subjektif pada Lanjut Usia Terlantar. Jurnal Psikologi Teori Dan Terapan, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v14n1.p124-140
Kurz, C. F., Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. (2024). Propensity score matching. In Nature Methods (Vol. 21, Number 10, pp. 1770–1772). Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02405-4
Lomas, T., Pawelski, J. O., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2023). A flexible map of flourishing: The dynamics and drivers of flourishing, well-being, health, and happiness. International Journal of Wellbeing, 13(4).
Massagony, A., Pandit, R., & White, B. (2026). Socioeconomic and climatic factors affecting household electricity consumption in Indonesia. Energy, 344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139749
Nasrudin, R., Quarina, Q., & Dartanto, T. (2022). Revisiting the energy-happiness paradox: A quasi-experimental evidence of electricity access in Indonesia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(7), 3549–3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00567-6
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., & Altman, M. (2020). The happiness-energy paradox: Energy use is unrelated to subjective well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(4), 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09719-y
Renanita, T., & Rembulan, C. L. (2025). The Effects of Social Comparison and Subjective Financial Well-Being on Subjective Well-Being. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.14791
Salac, A. C., Somera, J. D. C., Castro, M. T., Divinagracia-Luzadas, M. F., Danao, L. A. M., & Ocon, J. D. (2024). Off-Grid Electrification Using Renewable Energy in the Philippines: A Comprehensive Review. In Smart Cities (Vol. 7, Number 3). https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7030043
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
Shyu, C.-W. (2024). A framework of basic human energy needs for decent quality of life at household level: Policy implications for enhancing energy justice and meeting SDG7. Journal of Asian Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2446020
Statistik, B. P. (2021). Indeks Kebahagiaan 2021. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2021/12/27/ba1b0f03770569b5ac3ef58e/happiness-index-2021.html
Tomo, S. W., & Pierewan, A. C. (2018). Kesejahteraan subjektif dan usia di Indonesia. E-Societas: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21831/e-societas.v7i4.12608
Watema, J. R. A., Siele, R. K., & Kimitei, E. (2025). Non-farm income and household welfare: Empirical evidence from a developing economy. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2024.100232
Wirawan, H., & Gultom, Y. M. L. (2021). The effects of renewable energy-based village grid electrification on poverty reduction in remote areas: The case of Indonesia. Energy for Sustainable Development, 62, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.04.006
Zhang, Z., Kim, H. J., Lonjon, G., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching. Annals of Translational Medicine, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.12.10
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andika Nugraha Putra, Muhammad Halley Yudhistira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
